STAR HardProbes PWG

[Sooraj Radhakrishnan <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov>]

Hi Andrew,

   Thanks for preparing this nice abstract. Please find a few comments from me below

L22: in p+p collisions --> p+p collisions

L23: GeV/c (not as a fraction). Do you want to specify the kinematic range in the abstract?

L25: I dont think you need to define PYTHIA6 for HP abstract

L27: scale dependence of the QGP doesnt read right, what do you refer to here? Modification from QGP at different length/angular scales? Should rephrase if so

thanks

Sooraj

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 12:00 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Andrew,

Thank you for implementing my comments.
I have a few additional comments below.

L6: "Other time information" Not clear what is other time besides "split
formation time" ?
L23: "The response of the EEC to selections on jet pT …. 15 GeV/c to 50
GeV/c" ->" The EEC of full jet pT will be shown in a kinematic range 
from 15 to 50 GeV/$\it c$ using the STAR barrel calorimeter detectors
and time projection chamber. "
L25: "… PYTHIA 6, a Monte Carlo event generator." -> "… PYTHIA-6."  (If
it is STAR tune, then mention it please)


Cheers
Nihar






On 2022-11-29 01:14, Andrew Tamis wrote:
> Hello Barbara and Nihar
>
> Thank you for the comments!  I have implemented both of your
> suggestions.  I included split formation time as an example of time
> information that soft drop and the lund plane extract.  I have also
> listed PYTHIA 6 as the monte carlo generator I am using for
> comparisons.
>
> Please let me know if you have any more comments
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 6:07 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hello Andrew,
>>
>> Please find my comment on your nice abstract.
>>
>> L6: "extract time information " -> please mention what time
>> information.
>> Do you mean "formation time of parton shower" ?
>> L12:"…  jet evolution .." -> the jet evolution
>> L14: "infrared and collinear " -> "infrared-and-collinear "
>> L21: "data from" -> "the data from";  "in p+p collisions"
>> L22: for the detector effect;
>> "a Monte Carlo event generator " -> better to mention what are
>> those
>> generators or models?
>>
>> Please give some information how do you select jet in pp and what
>> kinematic range you plan to present.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Nihar
>>
>> On 2022-11-21 10:58, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>
>>> Andrew Tamis (andrew.tamis AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for
>> a
>>> review,
>>> please have a look:
>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61793
>>>
>>> Deadline: 2022-12-05
>>> ---
>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

--

Sooraj Radhakrishnan

Research Scientist,

Department of Physics

Kent State University

Kent, OH 44243

Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate

Nuclear Science Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road

Berkeley, CA 94720

Ph: 510-495-2473

Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov