U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

On Mar 1, 2023, at 8:09 PM, Thomas Schwarz <schwarzt AT umich.edu> wrote:

You probably don't have simulation numbers for the various 'baseline' BCP's.  Might just want to note you are starting from FDR 'presented' numbers.  I do wonder if this is going to open up questions asking us to explain why the baseline numbers are different from the FDR numbers.  

It says it’s NSF FDR in the table.

Also, not clear where/if the L2's are supposed to contribute to answering questions.

None I think.

===================

Tom Schwarz

Associate Professor

Department of Physics

University of Michigan 

Office: 734-764-8941

Lab: 734-763-7805

schwarzt AT umich.edu

===================

On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:00 PM Thomas Schwarz <schwarzt AT umich.edu> wrote:

For the table in q3, the numbers you have as original are the "FDR" numbers, not the baseline.  Is that what you want?  There will be some consistency issues - at least for muons.  Our baseline starts at BCP 1028.

Tom

===================

Tom Schwarz

Associate Professor

Department of Physics

University of Michigan 

Office: 734-764-8941

Lab: 734-763-7805

schwarzt AT umich.edu

===================

On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 1:57 PM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Hi,

I set up a google sheets doc so everybody can edit:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pc9McRumCppvOabd6qAar9a6aF741cOPTeVNOuYmd6M/edit?usp=sharing

I have answered question 3.  I think Penka was going to work on #1 after Alexei asked his question.  #2 is for Chris and I think between you and Hal you should be able to answer #4.  Hal has slides on this from the FDR.

Best,

Gustaaf

On Mar 1, 2023, at 6:40 PM, Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net> wrote:

Hi Gustaaf,

I can put together something on subaward management.

 

Do you have the original breakdown for 3? I have that based on the official breakdown as in our original award (I also put the breakdown for 1057 that I used in one of my slides), so could also do that if it helps.

 

Maybe Hal could take what we get from the L2s and flesh out the last point on system engineering and interface management? I will make the subaward management slide.

 

Can ask about the schedule distributions – one thought is that we posted Chris’ talk in the management breakout section … maybe they looked there and found something?

 

Cheers, Mike

 

From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 6:33 PM
To: Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>; Meyer, Chris <cjmey AT iu.edu>
Cc: us-atlas-hllhc-pmgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov; usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March 1-2 Director’s Review Homework Questions

 

 

Hi Mike,

 

I can produce the table for item #3 easily.  I’m not sure what #2 means - I don’t think we showed them graphs for MC schedule distributions, so maybe you can ask them what they mean by that?  But I guess Chris can put a few of the PRA output graphs on a few slides?

 

Best,

 

Gustaaf

On Mar 1, 2023, at 6:28 PM, Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net> wrote:

 

Hi All,

Attached are the homework questions. Most are addressed to the PO it looks like. The one area where L2s can contribute is part of the last one on system engineering practices and interface management – please put together some response for that.

 

Thanks, PO

 

From: LeCompte, Tom <lecompte AT slac.stanford.edu> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 6:19 PM
To: Michael Tuts <tuts AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Cc: Victor Krabbendam <VKrabbendam AT lsst.org>; Gutta, Rajendra Rao <rgutta AT bnl.gov>; Marco Verzocchi (marco.verzocchi AT gmail.com) <marco.verzocchi AT gmail.com>; Sarah Eno <eno AT umd.edu>; Ted Liu (thliu AT fnal.gov) <thliu AT fnal.gov>; Darin Acosta <dea6 AT rice.edu>; Alexei N. Safonov <safonov AT tamu.edu>; Denisov, Dmitri <denisovd AT bnl.gov>
Subject: March 1-2 Director’s Review Homework Questions

 

Hi Mike-

We have just a handful of questions:

• We would like to see a high-level (say Levels 1 and 2) milestone-based  comparison ofthe  original and revised schedules.
• We saw graphs of the schedule distributions from Monte Carlo runs; we would like to see similar graphs for cost
• We would like to see a table with four columns - original base and contingency and revised base and contingency. Rows should be at the the L2 level of detail.
• Please prepare a few slides to address Question K, "Is
• the project adhering to best practices in systems engineering, interface management, and subaward management?:

This should not sum up to more than a few slides.

The expectation is that Management, Cost & Schedule will not meet tomorrow, and instead people will join the various technical subcommittees. If this is a problem, let me know and we can adjust.

If you have questions, please email me or call at 331-803-0446.

Cheers,

Tom

_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l

 

_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l